Framer Is Beautiful. Here's Why You'll Still Outgrow It.
Framer is the best-looking website builder in 2026. But beauty has a ceiling, and that ceiling gets lower every month as AI changes what's possible with code.
MigrateLab Team
Migration Experts

We Like Framer. Genuinely.
Let's start here: Framer is the most elegant website builder on the market. The UI is gorgeous. The animations are butter-smooth. The component system is actually well-designed. If you're building a portfolio or a marketing site and you want it to look incredible, Framer is a legitimate choice.
We say this as a team that makes money migrating people off Framer. We're not being diplomatic — we genuinely believe it's a well-made product.
But we also see what happens 12-18 months in, and it's always the same story.
The Pattern We See
Here's the timeline, based on dozens of conversations with Framer users who eventually became our clients:
Month 1-3: Honeymoon
Everything is amazing. You built a beautiful site in a weekend. The animations are perfect. The responsive design works. You're telling everyone about Framer.
Month 4-6: First Cracks
You need a contact form that does more than send an email. You need to integrate with your CRM. You need a blog with categories and pagination that actually works. You embed a third-party widget and it breaks the layout on mobile.
Month 7-12: Workarounds
Your site is now a patchwork of embedded iframes, Zapier integrations, and third-party services stitched together with hope. You're paying for Framer plus Typeform plus Mailchimp plus Calendly plus a bunch of other tools because Framer can't do what you need natively.
Month 13-18: The Ceiling
You need user authentication. Or a dashboard. Or dynamic pricing. Or internationalization. Or server-side logic of any kind. And you realize: Framer literally cannot do this. Not "it's hard" — it's architecturally impossible. Framer generates client-side React apps. There is no server. There is no backend. There is no database.
Month 18+: Migration
You start looking for alternatives. You find us.
The Specific Walls You'll Hit
1. No Server-Side Anything
Framer sites are fully client-rendered. This means:
- No API routes (you can't process webhooks, payments, or form submissions on the server)
- No server-side rendering (worse SEO, slower initial load for content-heavy pages)
- No environment variables or secrets (everything is exposed to the client)
- No background jobs (email sending, data processing, scheduled tasks)
2. CMS Limitations
Framer's CMS is fine for simple blogs. But it can't handle:
- Content relationships ("related posts," "author has many articles")
- Computed fields or validation logic
- Role-based access (editors, admins, contributors)
- API access to content (for mobile apps, email templates, etc.)
- More than a handful of collection types
3. Performance at Scale
Every Framer page loads the entire Framer runtime — a React application with animation libraries, the component system, and all your site's code. For a 5-page portfolio, the overhead is negligible. For a 50-page content site, your users are downloading megabytes of JavaScript before they see a single word.
Next.js, by comparison, code-splits automatically. Each page loads only the JavaScript it needs. A blog post page might be 50KB of JavaScript. The same page in Framer could be 500KB+.
4. The AI Gap
This is the newest wall, and it's growing higher every month. In 2026:
- Claude Code can refactor a Next.js component in 10 seconds
- Cursor can add a new feature to a codebase in minutes
- v0 can generate entire pages from descriptions
None of these tools work with Framer projects. Your competitors with code-based sites are iterating 10x faster than you. Not because they're better developers — because AI is amplifying their code and it can't amplify your Framer project.
The Migration Isn't as Scary as You Think
Here's the good news: because Framer is React-based, the mental model translates directly to Next.js. Your components, your layout patterns, your responsive approach — they all map to the same concepts in code. You're not learning a new paradigm. You're just removing the training wheels.
A typical Framer-to-Next.js migration takes 1-3 weeks depending on complexity. After that, you have:
- Everything Framer gave you (design, animations, responsive layout)
- Everything Framer couldn't (server-side logic, real CMS, unlimited customization)
- Everything the future demands (AI-editable, version controlled, infinitely extensible)
Framer is a beautiful starting point. Code is where you go to grow.
| Feature | Framer | Next.js Code |
|---|---|---|
| Visual design speed | Excellent | Good (with AI) |
| Animation capabilities | Built-in, easy | Framer Motion (same library) |
| Server-side logic | Impossible | Full control |
| CMS capabilities | Basic | Unlimited |
| Performance at scale | Degrades | Optimized |
| AI-editable | No | Fully |
| Custom integrations | Embed/iframe only | Native APIs |
| Version control | No | Git |
| Monthly cost | $15-30 | $0-20 |
Outgrowing Framer?
We'll keep your beautiful design and give you the power of real code. Get a free migration assessment.